Cybersecurity Risk Assessments
Cybersecurity Risk Assessments for Growing and Regulated Organizations
Identify what could hurt the business most—and what to address first.
Secure Technology Consultants helps organizations understand their most important cybersecurity risks, evaluate existing safeguards, and turn findings into a prioritized and practical remediation roadmap. Assessments are calibrated to the organization’s size, operations, technology environment, contractual obligations, and available resources.
Atlanta & Georgia
Cybersecurity Risk Assessments for Atlanta Organizations
Secure Technology Consultants is based in Atlanta, Georgia and provides cybersecurity risk assessments to growing, regulated, and contract-driven organizations in Metro Atlanta and nationwide. Assessments are evidence-based and scaled to the organization’s size, technology environment, business risks, contractual obligations, and available resources.
Organizations often contact STC when:
- Leadership needs a clear baseline of the organization's current cybersecurity risk.
- A customer, contract, insurer, auditor, or regulator is asking security questions the organization cannot confidently answer.
- An MSP or internal IT team manages technology, but leadership wants an independent view of cyber risk and priorities.
- Previous audits, assessments, or technical scans identified issues but did not provide a practical remediation sequence.
- The organization has experienced an incident, near miss, or significant technology change and wants to understand remaining risk.
- Leadership needs to determine which security investments should be funded first.
- Policies and controls exist, but the organization is unsure whether they are actually implemented, documented, and supported by evidence.
What we assess
A full view of the controls, processes and evidence behind your risk
- Cybersecurity governance and risk ownership
- Asset and technology inventory
- Identity, access and privileged-account management
- Data handling, sharing, retention and protection
- Endpoint, cloud and network security
- Vulnerability and configuration-management practices
- Third-party and vendor risk
- Incident response and business-continuity readiness
- Policies, procedures and security documentation
- Security monitoring, reporting and escalation
Benchmark-informed approach
Benchmarks selected for your environment, not applied wholesale
STC selects the benchmarks that are relevant to your environment, obligations, and objectives, and states clearly which requirements were in scope. An assessment does not test every requirement in every framework.
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
- Selected NIST SP 800-53 and NIST SP 800-171 controls
- CIS Critical Security Controls
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- Applicable contractual, insurance and industry requirements
Assessment process
A five-stage process from scope to leadership decisions
- 01
Define Scope
Agree on scope, objectives, and stakeholders so the assessment reflects the systems, obligations, and decisions that matter to the business.
- 02
Gather Evidence
Request relevant records and administrative evidence, including policies, configurations, inventories, and prior assessment or audit material.
- 03
Interview and Observe
Conduct interviews with the people who operate the environment and perform targeted technical observations to confirm what is actually in place.
- 04
Evaluate Risk
Identify risks, control gaps, and evidence limitations, then evaluate likelihood, business impact, and urgency for each finding.
- 05
Prioritize and Report
Prioritize recommended actions and present findings and next-step decisions to leadership in business terms rather than raw technical output.
Deliverables
What clients receive
- Executive summary
- Current-state observations
- Prioritized risk and findings register
- Control-gap summary
- Recommended corrective actions
- 30-, 60- or 90-day remediation roadmap
- Leadership readout
- Separate implementation scope when requested
Assessment options
Engagements scoped to the question you need answered
Initial scoping assessment
A short engagement to establish the environment, obligations, and where a deeper assessment should focus.
Focused risk assessment
A targeted review of a specific system, business process, or area of concern raised by leadership.
Framework-aligned gap assessment
A review against selected requirements from an agreed framework, sized to the environment and the contractual driver.
Third-party or vendor-risk review
Evaluation of vendor access, data handling, and contractual security expectations for the relationships that matter most.
Post-incident control review
A structured look at the controls, detection, and response practices involved in a recent incident or near miss.
Recurring risk and remediation oversight
Ongoing reassessment and remediation tracking so risk decisions and progress stay current as the environment changes.
Relevant experience
Assessment experience across regulated and public-sector environments
STC has supported public-sector, energy-sector and professional-services environments through risk assessments, control reviews, policy analysis, remediation planning, security-roadmap development and executive reporting.
STC assessments are advisory and evidence-based. Unless expressly stated in a separate written scope, services do not constitute a penetration test, certification audit, legal opinion or guarantee that every vulnerability or risk will be identified.
Frequently asked questions
Questions we hear before an assessment starts
- What is included in a cybersecurity risk assessment?
- A typical assessment reviews governance, assets, identity and access, data handling, endpoint and cloud security, vulnerability practices, vendor risk, response readiness, documentation, and monitoring, then produces prioritized findings and a remediation roadmap.
- How is a risk assessment different from a vulnerability scan?
- A scan enumerates technical weaknesses in systems. A risk assessment evaluates governance, processes, controls, and evidence together with technical observations, and weighs each issue by likelihood and business impact so remediation can be sequenced.
- Which security framework will STC use?
- STC selects benchmarks based on your environment and requirements, drawing on NIST CSF 2.0, selected NIST SP 800-53 and 800-171 controls, the CIS Critical Security Controls, CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals, and applicable contractual, insurance, or industry requirements. Not every assessment tests every requirement in every framework.
- How much access will STC need?
- Most work is performed through interviews, documentation review, and read-only or observed access to configurations. Access is agreed in advance and limited to what the assessment scope requires.
- Will the assessment disrupt business operations?
- Assessments are designed to be non-disruptive. Activity is scheduled around your operations and consists primarily of interviews, evidence review, and observation rather than intrusive testing.
- What happens after the assessment?
- Leadership receives a readout covering prioritized findings, control gaps, recommended corrective actions, and a 30-, 60-, or 90-day roadmap, along with the decisions that need owners and budget.
- Can STC help implement the recommendations?
- Yes, under a separate agreed scope. STC can provide remediation guidance, assist with documentation and control implementation, or coordinate with your internal IT team, MSP, and other vendors.
- Do you provide cybersecurity risk assessments in Atlanta?
- Yes. Secure Technology Consultants is based in Atlanta, Georgia and provides cybersecurity risk assessments for organizations throughout Metro Atlanta and nationwide. Much of the assessment work can be performed remotely, with onsite interviews, workshops, evidence review, or technical observations used when appropriate to the engagement.
- When should an organization conduct a cybersecurity risk assessment?
- A risk assessment is useful when leadership needs a reliable picture of current cyber risk, after significant technology or business changes, before major contractual or compliance decisions, when cyber insurance or customers require stronger evidence, following an incident or near miss, or when existing security projects need to be prioritized. The objective is to identify the risks that matter most and establish a practical sequence for addressing them.
Know your top risks and the order to address them.
Start with a short scoping conversation about your environment, obligations, and the risks leadership is most concerned about.
Request a Consultation